Skip to content

Grafana Dashboards Observability LGTM

Grafana Observability Dashboards for Unified Metrics, Logs and Traces

Grafana ties metrics, logs and distributed traces into a single pane of glass — eliminating context-switching between Datadog, Splunk and CloudWatch during an incident. We design and deploy production Grafana environments with the full LGTM stack (Loki, Grafana, Tempo, Mimir), dashboards-as-code provisioning, SSO and RBAC for US and EU engineering teams who need operational visibility without vendor lock-in.

Get a proposal See cases

Grafana ties metrics, logs and distributed traces into a single pane of glass — eliminating context-switching between Datadog, Splunk and CloudWatch during an incident. We design and deploy production Grafana environments with the full LGTM stack (Loki, Grafana, Tempo, Mimir), dashboards-as-code provisioning, SSO and RBAC for US and EU engineering teams who need operational visibility without vendor lock-in.

Challenges

Industry challenges we solve

Dashboard sprawl and governance

Unmanaged Grafana instances accumulate hundreds of ad-hoc dashboards with inconsistent naming, broken panels and no ownership. Finding the authoritative view during an incident wastes critical minutes.

Data source security and RBAC

Broad data-source permissions expose sensitive infrastructure metrics to the wrong teams. Without folder-level RBAC and per-data-source service accounts, any Grafana user can query production databases.

Alerting consistency across stacks

Teams running both Grafana Alerting and Prometheus Alertmanager end up with duplicated, conflicting alert rules. Routing logic diverges, notifications are missed and on-call engineers receive contradictory pages.

Dashboards-as-code adoption

Manually created dashboards cannot be version-controlled, reviewed or promoted across environments. Organisations that rely on UI-only editing cannot reproduce their observability setup after a cluster migration.

Unified logs, metrics and traces

Without a correlated LGTM stack, engineers switch between separate Prometheus, Loki and Jaeger UIs during an incident — losing time re-querying the same time window across disconnected tools.

SSO integration and multi-tenancy

Connecting Grafana to corporate identity providers (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) and enforcing team-level folder isolation requires careful SAML/OIDC configuration that is easy to misconfigure silently.

Solutions

Solutions we build

Dashboards-as-code standardisation

All dashboards defined in version-controlled JSON/YAML via Grafana provisioning — templated, peer-reviewed and promoted through dev/staging/production with zero manual UI clicks.

Full LGTM stack deployment

Grafana + Loki + Tempo + Mimir deployed as a self-hosted or Grafana Cloud stack — one unified query surface for logs, distributed traces and long-retention metrics without per-metric cardinality limits.

RBAC, SSO and folder isolation

SAML/OIDC integration with Okta, Azure AD or Google Workspace; folder-level RBAC mapping IdP groups to Grafana roles; per-data-source service accounts with read-only least-privilege access.

Correlated observability (logs + metrics + traces)

Grafana Explore links and exemplar annotations correlate a Loki log spike with a Mimir metric anomaly and the corresponding Tempo trace — root cause in one click rather than three tool switches.

Grafana Alerting and OnCall

Unified alert rules in Grafana Alerting replace dual Alertmanager routing; Grafana OnCall manages escalation schedules, silences and incident timelines — with Slack, PagerDuty and Mattermost integrations.

Multi-datasource integration

Single-pane dashboards combining Prometheus, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, CloudWatch and custom API data sources — query federation without data duplication or ETL pipelines.

Stack

Technology stack

Grafana, Grafana Loki (logs), Grafana Tempo (traces), Grafana Mimir (metrics), Grafana Alerting, Grafana OnCall, Prometheus, OpenTelemetry, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, CloudWatch, provisioned dashboards-as-code, SSO/SAML/OIDC, RBAC.

Compliance

Compliance & regulations

GDPR-aligned RBAC · SOC 2 audit logging · NIS2 incident visibility · DORA operational resilience

EU

  • GDPR — RBAC and data-source permissions prevent PII from appearing in dashboards; Grafana hosted on EU infrastructure; data-minimisation enforced at the query layer.
  • EU AI Act — model observability dashboards track inference latency, drift metrics and error rates to support AI system transparency requirements.
  • NIS2 — unified monitoring across services and infrastructure provides the centralised incident-visibility baseline NIS2 operational continuity obligations require.
  • DORA — correlated dashboards and Grafana OnCall on-call schedules support the operational resilience and recovery-time documentation DORA mandates for financial entities.

US

  • SOC 2 — Grafana audit logs record every dashboard change, data-source access and user login; SSO integration enforces the access-control evidence SOC 2 Type II auditors expect.
  • Incident response — Grafana Alerting and OnCall provide the documented, traceable incident-response workflows that SOC 2 and NIST CSF operational-visibility controls require.
  • Least-privilege data sources — each data source is provisioned with a read-only service account scoped to the minimum required dataset, satisfying least-privilege access requirements.
  • Dashboards-as-code audit trail — all dashboard definitions live in version-controlled JSON/YAML; every change is reviewed, approved and traceable — a clean artifact for compliance audits.

Why YuSMP

Why engineering teams choose YuSMP for Grafana observability

No vendor lock-in

The full LGTM stack is open-source and self-hostable. We design your observability platform so you own the data, the dashboards and the alerting logic — not a SaaS vendor's pricing model.

Dashboards that survive team turnover

Version-controlled, provisioned dashboards mean a new engineer can rebuild your entire observability environment from a Git repository. There are no undocumented UI-only customisations.

Faster incident resolution

Correlated logs, metrics and traces in one UI cut mean time to root cause. Our Grafana setups are designed around the workflows your on-call team uses under pressure, not demo aesthetics.

FAQ

Grafana Observability FAQ

Grafana vs Datadog — which should we choose?

Datadog is a fully managed SaaS with a broad feature surface and usage-based pricing that scales steeply at high cardinality. Grafana (self-hosted or Grafana Cloud) gives you control over data residency, pricing and the full LGTM stack. We recommend Grafana for teams with GDPR/data-sovereignty requirements, high metric cardinality budgets, or a preference for open-source tooling — and Datadog when a managed, zero-ops platform justifies the cost.

What is the LGTM stack?

LGTM stands for Loki (log aggregation), Grafana (visualisation and alerting), Tempo (distributed tracing) and Mimir (long-retention scalable metrics, a drop-in Prometheus replacement). Together they form a self-hosted observability platform that covers all three telemetry pillars — logs, metrics and traces — under a single Grafana UI without requiring separate specialist tools for each signal type.

What does dashboards-as-code mean in Grafana?

Grafana's provisioning system reads dashboard JSON and data-source YAML from files on disk (or a Git repository via tools such as Grafonnet or Terraform). This means every dashboard is version-controlled, code-reviewed and reproducible across environments. Changes are deployed through CI/CD rather than manual UI edits, giving you a full audit trail and the ability to roll back a bad dashboard change in seconds.

How does Grafana work with Prometheus?

Prometheus scrapes metrics from your services and stores them locally; Grafana queries Prometheus (or Mimir, a scalable Prometheus-compatible backend) via PromQL and renders the results as panels. Grafana does not replace Prometheus — it is the visualisation and alerting layer on top. In a typical LGTM setup, Mimir replaces the local Prometheus storage for long retention and horizontal scalability, while Prometheus agents continue scraping at the edge.

How do you configure RBAC, SSO and multi-tenancy in Grafana?

We configure Grafana's SAML or OIDC integration against your identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace). IdP groups are mapped to Grafana organisation roles and folder permissions. Each team sees only the dashboards and data sources assigned to their folder. In multi-tenant deployments, Grafana organisations or Grafana Enterprise's RBAC provide hard tenant boundaries with separate data-source credentials per tenant.

Loki vs Elasticsearch for log aggregation — which is better?

Loki indexes only labels (not full-text), making it far cheaper to operate at scale — it stores compressed log chunks in object storage (S3, GCS). Elasticsearch indexes every field, enabling powerful full-text search but at significantly higher storage and compute cost. Choose Loki when you control your log structure and query primarily by labels (service, environment, level); choose Elasticsearch when you need arbitrary full-text search across unstructured legacy logs or require Kibana's ecosystem.

Should we self-host Grafana or use Grafana Cloud?

Self-hosted Grafana (OSS or Enterprise) gives you full control over data residency, retention, cost and configuration — the right choice for strict GDPR/data-sovereignty requirements or high-volume metrics where Grafana Cloud pricing becomes significant. Grafana Cloud removes operational overhead and provides managed alerting, synthetic monitoring and frontend observability out of the box. We help teams evaluate the build-vs-buy tradeoff and can set up or migrate either option.

Deploy production-grade Grafana observability with senior platform engineers

Response within 1 business day. NDA on request.

Get a proposal